The correct order of precedence in a where clause is the following. All the clauses must be listed before the where clause.
The most popular way of expressing the order of precedence is with parentheses around the operator. So the second clause cannot be placed after the first one.
It’s important to remember that the order of precedence is relative and not absolute. This means that the rules of grammar are always changing and that different languages use different order of precedence. While it’s true that in some languages the order of precedence is listed first, it’s not the rule everywhere. For example, some languages have two or even three clauses in the order of precedence, but in most cases they only have one.
The order of precedence depends on the language and the grammatical system in which the statement is written. The order of precedence is usually listed first in most languages, but it can also be listed last in some systems. While its true that the order of precedence is important, its not absolute. Remember that this is a grammatical rule, and grammatical rules are always changing and that different languages use different order of precedence.
With a few exceptions, the order of precedence is not a universal rule. In a few cases, it is so, but these cases are quite rare. The order of precedence has a lot to do with how well the language specifies the order of the logical operators, but it does not always have to follow a strict order. The order of precedence affects how the operators work and can make your code more readable.
I will do a quick review here to get the context of where your code is falling down. Where you are defining the order of precedence is where the code is failing.
This is a great example of where you can use more readable code and still not know that. I think the most common places where you will find this problem are when you have a logical operator in a where clause that is followed by an or, not.
So in the first example, you can see that it is in the same order as the or, not operator, but when it is in a where clause that is followed by an or, not, it can be easily inferred that the order of precedence of the operators is in the opposite order of where clause.In the second example, there is no where clause so the order of precedence is out of order.
It is probably best to think of the logical operators as a hierarchy. For example, the expression left and right are on the same level. The order of precedence of these operators are left and right. The order of precedence of these operators is left and right. This is because when you have a logical operators that are followed by either, not or, it is very common to see them out of order.